Login to LISSY
LISSY is a remote-execution data access system for the LIS and LWS microdata... learn more ≫
Login to Web Tabulator
Design and generate descriptive cross-national tables based on LIS datasets... learn more ≫
In recent years, data from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) and Luxembourg Wealth Study (LWS) Databases have been extensively featured across multiple flagship United Nations publications.
The UNDP Human Development Report 2025 – A Matter of Choice: People and Possibilities in the Age of AI lists LIS among its official statistical references, underscoring the database’s global relevance. Similarly, UN Women’s World Survey on the Role of Women in Development 2024 draws on LIS data for several of its calculations.
At the regional level, the ESCWA Inequality Projection for Poverty Analysis (2024) cites LIS as an additional source for harmonized income distribution data. The UNICEF Report Card 18 – Child Poverty in the Midst of Wealth (2023) also references LIS as a key data source for its analyses.
Moreover, the ECLAC publication La distribución del ingreso y la riqueza: nuevas aproximaciones (2023) features a major chapter constructed directly from the LWS Database, with multiple figures and tables attributed to the “LIS Data Center, Luxembourg Wealth Study Database (LWS).”
Additionally, the ILO Working Paper 128 – Combating Inequalities: What Role for Universal Social Protection? (2024) draws upon LIS data to examine the role of social protection in reducing inequality.
Collectively, these reports highlight the central role of LIS and LWS data in advancing evidence-based policymaking and comparative research on inequality, poverty, and development across the globe.
LIS and LWS data were used extensively in the OECD’s new flagship report “To Have and Have Not – How to Bridge the Gap in Opportunities.” The report applies an innovative methodology to measure inequality of opportunity across OECD countries, going beyond outcome analysis to consider how individual circumstances shape opportunities throughout the life cycle.
In particular, Chapter 3, “Geographic Inequalities in Access to Opportunities,” draws on LIS and LWS data to produce several sub-national indicators. It examines how the places where people are born and raised influence their opportunities in life, showing how geography contributes to long-term inequalities in outcomes. The report also identifies policy options to promote social mobility at both national and local levels.
by Denys Orlov, (National Bank of Slovakia, Bratislava University of Economics and Business)
Understanding the determinants of voluntary savings is essential for ensuring both individual financial security and broader economic stability. Savings act as a crucial buffer against unexpected financial shocks and play a central role in sustaining living standards throughout retirement. In this article, Denys Orlov explores how the propensity to save for old age in the United Kingdom may be associated with financial literacy and a range of socio-demographic characteristics.
Full article is available here.
by Chiara Mussida, (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Dario Sciulli, (University of Chieti-Pescara)
In-work poverty (IWP) has become a persistent challenge in Europe, reflecting both the expansion of non-standard and low-paid employment, as well as the varying ability of welfare states to mitigate income inequalities. This contribution by Chiara Mussida and Dario Sciulli examines how social protection expenditure and labor market institutions affect the incidence of IWP across 22 European countries over the period 2009 to 2023.
Full article is available here.
by Jörg Neugschwender, (LIS)
Luxembourg’s unique demographic and economic profile, marked by a large foreign population and daily inflows of cross-border workers, raises important questions about inequality and social protection. Using LIS data for Luxembourg, France, Germany, and Belgium, this contribution by Jörg Neugschwender compares median incomes across household types, focusing on differences shaped by labour markets, pensions, and family benefits.
Full article is available here.
LIS is happy to announce the following data updates:
- France (2 new LIS datasets and 23 revised) – Addition of FR21 and FR22 to the LIS Database.
Read more » - Germany (2 new LIS datasets and 37 revised; 4 revised LWS datasets) – Update of the LIS series for DE21 and DE22 and revision based on SOEP-Core v40.1eu Edition.
Read more » - India (4 new LWS datasets) – NEW country! Addition of IN91, IN02, IN12, IN18 to the LWS Database.
Read more » - Luxembourg (2 new LIS datasets and 6 revised) – Addition of LU22 and LU23 to the LIS Database.
Read more » - Switzerland (3 new LIS datasets and 14 revised) – Annualisation to CH22 in the LIS Database.
Read more » - United Kingdom (1 new LWS dataset and 7 revised) – Addition of UK21 to the LWS Database.
Read more » - Uruguay (2 new LIS datasets and 15 revised) – Addition of UY23 and UY24 to the LIS Database.
Read more »
Click on `Read more’ to access more details on the newly added and revised datasets
Marc Fleurbaey, Chaired Professor at Paris School of Economics, presented the LIS Summer Lecture: Social contagion, inequality and mobility.
Marc Fleurbaey is a CNRS Senior Researcher, Chaired Professor at the Paris School of Economics, and Associate Professor at ENS-Ulm, where he co-directs the Center on the Environment and Society (CERES). Formerly Robert E. Kuenne Professor at Princeton University, he has authored several books including Beyond GDP and A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare, and published over 200 academic articles. A coordinating lead author for the IPCC and a founding member of the International Panel on Social Progress, he has served on the UN Committee for Development Policy and received the CNRS Silver Medal in 2024. He is a Fellow of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory.
by Supriya Lakhtakia, Deepak Malghan (Indian Institute of Management Bangalore), and Hema Swaminathan, (Asian Development Bank & Indian Institute of Management Bangalore)
The authors explore occupational assortative mating and its implications for gender inequality in earnings. Using LIS data across countries and time, they investigate how patterns of occupational similarity between partners influence both inter- and intra-household inequality, offering new insights into the global dynamics of household-level gender disparities.
Full article is available here.
by Jonathan Bradshaw, (University of York), Gianluca Munalli, (The Learning for Well-being Institute), and Dominic Richardson, (The Learning for Well-being Institute)
Using recent LIS data, the authors conduct a comparative analysis of child poverty across countries. They analyse a set of poverty rates by household composition and offer evidence-based policy recommendations to address child poverty and its long-term consequences.
Full article is available here.
by Vladimir Hlasny , (UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA))
This article addresses the issue of earnings underreporting and tax overreporting in global household surveys. Drawing on earlier literature and comparative LIS-based analysis, the author examines the risks of measurement error in survey-based income data, highlighting its impact on assessments of inequality and poverty.
Full article is available here.
What's new?

LIS Data Utilised Prominently in Recent United Nations Reports
LIS and LWS data have been extensively utilized across recent United Nations flagship reports.

LIS Data Featured in OECD’s New Flagship Report on Inequality: “To Have and Have Not – How to Bridge the Gap in Opportunities”
LIS and LWS data were extensively used in the OECD’s new report “To Have and Have Not – How to Bridge the Gap in Opportunities.”

Financial Literacy and Voluntary Savings in the United Kingdom
This article explores how the propensity to save for old age is associated with financial literacy and a range of socio-demographic characteristics.

In-Work Poverty, Social Protection, and Labor Market Institutions in Europe
This article examines how social protection expenditure and labor market institutions affect the incidence of IWP across 22 European countries.